Please start any new threads on our new site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2000 Forums
 SQL Server Administration (2000)
 SQL Memory Allocation

Author  Topic 

SamC
White Water Yakist

3467 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-23 : 15:59:32
Anyone got a good URL on how to instruct SQL 2000 to share memory with IIS without fighting over it?

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-23 : 16:23:45
Ugh. Why would you want to do this? I don't think that you can tell IIS to use a fixed size, but you can with SQL Server, although I don't ever set this as ours are always dedicated boxes.

Tara
Go to Top of Page

MuadDBA

628 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-23 : 16:25:03
I've got a good URL that will tell you never to share your IIS Server with your SQL Server....


www.sqlteam.com
Go to Top of Page

SamC
White Water Yakist

3467 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-23 : 16:40:06
Thanks
Go to Top of Page

Martin Babb
Starting Member

11 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 02:32:17
Sql Server and IIs are both self tuning and will spend some of their resources fighting for resources.

No point really
Go to Top of Page

SamC
White Water Yakist

3467 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 08:44:32
Let me phrase the question differently then.

What tools / what measurements would indicate that more memory would improve the performance of a combined IIS / SQL server?

Go to Top of Page

MuadDBA

628 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 09:53:58
You could look at page faults/second, and watch it over time.
Go to Top of Page

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 12:00:03
If I combined them, which I never would as that would make me a sucky DBA, then I would more than double the RAM if they were on separate machines. So if my web server normally would have 2GB and my db server normally would have 2GB, then I would probably have 5GB+ on the combined machine.

Tara
Go to Top of Page

SamC
White Water Yakist

3467 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 13:03:19
I think Tara just called me a suckey DBA !

Maybe Graz should implement a counter on our profiles. If we get too many negative votes from other members, "You're Fired!"

Anyway, it's a question of economics. I'd love dual servers. I really want a separate spindle for the database. It's a question of balancing budgets and by the way, there don't seem to be any performance issues at all anywhere (yet). Knock on wood.

But we're growing, and I expect one day we'll either add a second server because it's easily affordable, or because the server is taken to it's knees. I'd like to get some first-hand experience viewing metrics to raise a red flag before that happens.

Sam
Go to Top of Page

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 13:09:15
quote:
Originally posted by SamC

I think Tara just called me a suckey DBA !



Nah...aren't you filling the role of a DBA but you're mostly a developer? Developers filling the role get more leniency than a full-time DBA that should know better.

Tara
Go to Top of Page

SamC
White Water Yakist

3467 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 13:15:48
Thanks! No bad mark on my record then?

It's true. I read a post somewhere from a guy who claimed to have a lot of watered-down expertise in many subjects. I know his pain.

I spend a disproportionate amount of time in SQL because the return on investment is higher than writing comparable code in ASP or .NET. Not to mention SQL kicks ass whenever performance is an issue.

Sam
Go to Top of Page

spirit1
Cybernetic Yak Master

11752 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 13:36:15
i know what you mean with that.... i just loved the looks on my previous coworkers faces,
when i wrote an sql statement that did the same thing as very much lines of code in c#.
it also shortened the time from 3 minutes to 5 seconds...
it's times like that when time spent learning it and hanging here is well spent.

Go with the flow & have fun! Else fight the flow :)
Go to Top of Page

X002548
Not Just a Number

15586 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 13:48:06
quote:
Originally posted by tduggan
Nah...aren't you filling the role of a DBA but you're mostly a developer? Developers filling the role get more leniency than a full-time DBA that should know better.



Hey there's always a cut over at some point....

Damn the .net torpeadoes....full dba skills ahead.....

But I wouldn't suggest just being a pure production dba.....

How about system architect....it all starts with the db anyway....

Or...window washer.....

Oh, and tell the cheap son of a beaches to lay out some cash....






Brett

8-)
Go to Top of Page

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 13:54:06
Yeah definitely not a pure production DBA. That's pretty much what I was at my last job. Mostly fighting fires. Glad those days are over.

Tara
Go to Top of Page

Martin Babb
Starting Member

11 Posts

Posted - 2004-08-24 : 20:24:59
Try this. It at least gives some control over what IIS is doing.

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=308186

Go to Top of Page
   

- Advertisement -