Please start any new threads on our new site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2000 Forums
 Import/Export (DTS) and Replication (2000)
 DTS or replication or text files

Author  Topic 

rkhairi
Starting Member

4 Posts

Posted - 2006-05-09 : 03:50:42
Hi,
I need help in deciding which method to choose either DTS or replication or FTP text files and this is my scenario:
- There are about 600 branches with minimum 9.6K connection to the HQ
- There are multiple version of SQL; 6.5, 7.0 and 2K – HQ=2005
- Every morning I need to transfer a data from HQ to every branch – very minimum data
- Every 5 min I need to transfer transaction data from every branch to HQ

So can you all help me by giving your expert advice which method should I choose?

Your help is really appreciated.

TQ.

jen
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker

4110 Posts

Posted - 2006-05-09 : 05:23:07
when you say transaction data to HQ, is that all of 600 into one table? or one table pr branch?

--------------------
keeping it simple...
Go to Top of Page

rkhairi
Starting Member

4 Posts

Posted - 2006-05-09 : 06:18:42
jen,
600 to one table.....is it advisable?
Go to Top of Page

jen
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker

4110 Posts

Posted - 2006-05-09 : 10:27:24
what is the purpose for HQ? is it for repository only, for merge reports or will they still undergo further processing?




--------------------
keeping it simple...
Go to Top of Page

rkhairi
Starting Member

4 Posts

Posted - 2006-05-09 : 21:07:31
at HQ the data will be merge and then sent to another system ie SAP and also kept for certain period for reporting.
Go to Top of Page

jen
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker

4110 Posts

Posted - 2006-05-09 : 22:23:29
i haven't seen this much source to one destination using replication
how many rows do you expect HQ will receive from each branch?

by the looks of it, an automated file transfer will be my bet, in dts, you will need uninterrupted connection atleast for the duration of the transfer, and if something happens and it gets cut off prepare for a longer rollback

each branch will output the text file into the sftp site, then your HQ will retrieve the file and feed them into the table, you have an option to do it one table per branch or one to all, but the concern is the sheer volume of data that you need to retain and manipulate

it's better to get the numbers straighten out before deciding which option will give you better performance and "recoverability" in case something happens to HQ

hope that makes sense...

--------------------
keeping it simple...
Go to Top of Page

rkhairi
Starting Member

4 Posts

Posted - 2006-05-09 : 22:38:43
thanks jen ya i think that is the best bet anyway thanks again....
Go to Top of Page
   

- Advertisement -