Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
AskSQLTeam
Ask SQLTeam Question
0 Posts |
 Posted - 2002-05-02 : 10:54:09
|
| Anon writes "We are still getting together the rather large list of licenses we need for Windows 2000, SQL Server 2000 Enterprise etc. If we don't have things setup in the License Manager? Is there any reliable way of determining exactly what licenses you need for SQL Server, or does everyone just get the per-processor licenses and get it over with?Anon" |
|
|
AjarnMark
SQL Slashing Gunting Master
3246 Posts |
Posted - 2002-05-02 : 14:19:58
|
| The per-processor license is popular, especially among large companies, and I think it is the only valid option if your SQL Server is going to be accessed from web pages.Otherwise, I believe that you can still do a CAL type of licensing. Check [url]http://www.microsoft.com/licensing[/url] to be sure. |
 |
|
|
MichaelP
Jedi Yak
2489 Posts |
Posted - 2002-05-02 : 14:26:17
|
| This sorta goes with the posters question as well.We discovered we had 2 Per seat licenses setup for our SQL Server 2000 Cluster. We plan on getting processor licenses, but what performance / connection issues will we have if we have it currently setup Per seat?Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing and it's affect on performance