Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
Tirez
Starting Member
13 Posts |
Posted - 2011-12-21 : 21:52:18
|
| i have question about maximum records that in SQL Server can be load? or there are not limitation for that, so it can be run normally because in MS Access there is. |
|
|
X002548
Not Just a Number
15586 Posts |
|
|
visakh16
Very Important crosS Applying yaK Herder
52326 Posts |
Posted - 2011-12-22 : 01:41:41
|
quote: Originally posted by Tirez i have question about maximum records that in SQL Server can be load? or there are not limitation for that, so it can be run normally because in MS Access there is.
you mean max records that can be held in sql table?------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SQL Server MVPhttp://visakhm.blogspot.com/ |
 |
|
|
madhivanan
Premature Yak Congratulator
22864 Posts |
Posted - 2011-12-22 : 02:36:24
|
| Read about Maximum capacity specifications in sql server help fileMadhivananFailing to plan is Planning to fail |
 |
|
|
Tirez
Starting Member
13 Posts |
Posted - 2011-12-22 : 21:08:42
|
| i think you all don't get my point yet. In MS Access there's limitation of maximum records and it can be solved with split the table so it's can be run normally but if it does not it'll be run so slowly. So my question is In SQL server database is there limitation maximum records of it can be held? so it can be run normally and fast even though so many Query table/records and relation ship in it? or the solution is the same with when i'm used to be use MS Access? |
 |
|
|
khtan
In (Som, Ni, Yak)
17689 Posts |
Posted - 2011-12-22 : 21:26:54
|
ReferenceSQL Server 2000 : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa933149%28SQL.80%29.aspxSQL Server 2005 : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432%28SQL.90%29.aspxSQL Server 2008 : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspxquote: Rows per table : Limited by available storage
KH[spoiler]Time is always against us[/spoiler] |
 |
|
|
Tirez
Starting Member
13 Posts |
Posted - 2011-12-22 : 21:57:18
|
| thanks a lot |
 |
|
|
|
|
|