Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
ValterBorges
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
1429 Posts |
Posted - 2004-01-11 : 10:03:01
|
| Here's the dealI have two instances on one box (VC and HY).The box has 4 processors, 8 gig RAM.The VC instance is loaded with large amounts of data on sundays and then accessed for reading throughout the week.The HY instance is accessed for reading and writting Monday-Friday 9-5. I would like for all available processors to be used but to reserver 3GB of ram for each instance, 2 for OS.Here are my current sp_configure settings. Any performance recommendations would be appreciated.Instance VCsp_configurename minimum maximum config_value run_value ----------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- affinity mask -2147483648 2147483647 0 0allow updates 0 1 0 0awe enabled 0 1 0 0c2 audit mode 0 1 0 0cost threshold for parallelism 0 32767 5 5Cross DB Ownership Chaining 0 1 1 1cursor threshold -1 2147483647 -1 -1default full-text language 0 2147483647 1033 1033default language 0 9999 0 0fill factor (%) 0 100 70 0index create memory (KB) 704 2147483647 0 0lightweight pooling 0 1 0 0locks 5000 2147483647 0 0max degree of parallelism 0 32 4 4max server memory (MB) 4 2147483647 0 2147483647max text repl size (B) 0 2147483647 65536 65536max worker threads 32 32767 255 255media retention 0 365 0 0min memory per query (KB) 512 2147483647 1024 1024min server memory (MB) 0 2147483647 0 0nested triggers 0 1 1 1network packet size (B) 512 65536 4096 4096open objects 0 2147483647 0 0priority boost 0 1 0 0query governor cost limit 0 2147483647 0 0query wait (s) -1 2147483647 -1 -1recovery interval (min) 0 32767 0 0remote access 0 1 1 1remote login timeout (s) 0 2147483647 20 20remote proc trans 0 1 0 0remote query timeout (s) 0 2147483647 600 600scan for startup procs 0 1 0 0set working set size 0 1 0 0show advanced options 0 1 1 1two digit year cutoff 1753 9999 2049 2049user connections 0 32767 0 0user options 0 32767 0 0Instance HYsp_configurename minimum maximum config_value run_value ----------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- affinity mask -2147483648 2147483647 0 0allow updates 0 1 0 0awe enabled 0 1 0 0c2 audit mode 0 1 0 0cost threshold for parallelism 0 32767 5 5Cross DB Ownership Chaining 0 1 1 1cursor threshold -1 2147483647 -1 -1default full-text language 0 2147483647 1033 1033default language 0 9999 0 0fill factor (%) 0 100 0 0index create memory (KB) 704 2147483647 0 0lightweight pooling 0 1 0 0locks 5000 2147483647 0 0max degree of parallelism 0 32 0 0max server memory (MB) 4 2147483647 0 2147483647max text repl size (B) 0 2147483647 65536 65536max worker threads 32 32767 255 255media retention 0 365 0 0min memory per query (KB) 512 2147483647 1024 1024min server memory (MB) 0 2147483647 0 0nested triggers 0 1 1 1network packet size (B) 512 65536 4096 4096open objects 0 2147483647 0 0priority boost 0 1 0 0query governor cost limit 0 2147483647 0 0query wait (s) -1 2147483647 -1 -1recovery interval (min) 0 32767 0 0remote access 0 1 1 1remote login timeout (s) 0 2147483647 20 20remote proc trans 0 1 0 0remote query timeout (s) 0 2147483647 600 600scan for startup procs 0 1 0 0set working set size 0 1 0 0show advanced options 0 1 1 1two digit year cutoff 1753 9999 2049 2049user connections 0 32767 0 0user options 0 32767 0 0 |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2004-01-12 : 12:32:14
|
| Valter, most of the configuration options should not be changed unless you experience specific problems like the lightweight pooling option. The SQL Server configuration options do not need to be changed on most systems. Out of the box, it is optimally configured for most. For others, extensive performance testing has to be done to see what effects are done when options are changed. So, it's hard to provide any recommendations without seeing the environment. Take a look at sql-server-performance.com if you want some information about the performance options to possibly change.Tara |
 |
|
|
|
|
|