Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
franco
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
255 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-16 : 08:41:01
|
| Future Environment:Cluster of 2 node IBM x445 4 CPU 2.0 GHZ 4GB Memory each server.1 Controller IBM FastT700 with 2 EXP700.26 FC-HDD 74GB 15K in RAID 1 + 2 Hot SpareTape and so on...I am in the process of configure this new cluster and I have a question about where to place db files and log files.I would like to put 4 dbs on one Array (disk D:\) and the 4 log files on another Array (disk E:\).For internal reason I have been asked if it possible ans safe to put other 2 databases and 2 log files on other different Arrays (disk F:\ for *.mdf files and disk G:\ for *.ldf files)So , the final design would be:4 databases on Array 1 - disk D:4 log files on Array 2 - disk E:2 databases on Array 3 - disk F:2 log files on Array 4 - disk G:What can you suggest?Any help is really appreciated.Thank you for your time.Franco |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-16 : 12:42:34
|
| Yes that would be fine. The key thing is that the log file isn't located on the same array as the database file. How big are these databases going to be? I'm wondering if 4GB is enough for memory.Tara |
 |
|
|
franco
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
255 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-16 : 15:23:21
|
| I receive your answer on my cell phone...here it is 9PM and I am at home.This is great.So the biggest db would be approximately 600MB and the other something like 200-300 maximum.On the other node I will running one Oracle instance.This node will also have 4GB of memory.Thank you for your time.Kind regards.Franco |
 |
|
|
JohnDeere
Posting Yak Master
191 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-16 : 21:59:16
|
| You should also condsider where you are going to place the tempdb. It is best if it can be placed on its own array as well. You did not mention how you are going to backup the databases. If you are using local disk consider a separate array or at least use the array with the least database activity to store your backups.Lance Harra |
 |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-16 : 22:11:44
|
| 4GB is probably going to be enough since your databases are relatively small.Tara |
 |
|
|
franco
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
255 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-17 : 01:59:58
|
| I have plan to use a dedicated Array also for native SQL Server Backups.Next I will copy the backup files on tape and copy the backup files and transaction log files backup (1 every hour) on another server...just in case something really bad happen.For tempdb I have no plan, do you think it is critical to put this file on a dedicated Array too?Thanks again for your support.Kind regards.Franco |
 |
|
|
eyechart
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
3575 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-17 : 02:33:45
|
quote: Originally posted by francodo you think it is critical to put this file on a dedicated Array too?
for optimal performance yes. Also, use 15k disks if possible on all arrays - especially the tempdb array.-update-I just read your post again and you are using all 73GB 15K disks. You may want to get some smaller capacity disks for the tempdb and logfile arrays so you don't waste a bunch of space.Also, how are you planning on carving out your drive space? Are you going to be creating separate arrays for each drive letter, or are you going to be creating separate partitions from one big array for each drive?-ec |
 |
|
|
franco
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
255 Posts |
Posted - 2004-02-17 : 05:01:03
|
| The idea is to create separate arrays for each drive letter.In fact I have to plan these resources:Arrays:1 SQL Server databases2 SQL Server transaction logs3 SQL Server backups4 SQL Server tempdb5 Oracle database6 Oracle redo logs7 Oracle archived redo logs8 Oracle Exports and Backup (RMAN)9 File system10 Ca-BrightStore arcServe Backup for Windows v.1111 Quorum disk (for the cluster)Every Array would have a different letter.I know that I am going to waste space but I need to have the Hot Spare disks able to be bring online if a failure occurs for some drives.To have the same disk capacity could be critical, so I decide to have all the FC-HDD to be the same dimension.Thank you for your suggestion.Kind regards. Franco |
 |
|
|
|
|
|