Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
cormac_hogan
Starting Member
3 Posts |
 Posted - 2008-09-03 : 11:24:31
|
| Hi All,Faced with using a SQL Server 2005 that is SAN attached however the application files were installed on the SAN Storage.The performance of the server seems poor and the server it self is high spec.Is the application files installed on the SAN storage a performance issue?Is it possible to relocate these files back to a local drive?Regards and thanks,Cormac |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
|
|
cormac_hogan
Starting Member
3 Posts |
Posted - 2008-09-04 : 03:55:56
|
| Hi,I'm referring to the program files. The database files are also installed on the SAN storage, which is what is to be expected. However the whoever did the initial install may have confused which drives were local and which were SAN, so they installed the program files on SAN storage too.Regards,Cormac |
 |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
|
|
cormac_hogan
Starting Member
3 Posts |
Posted - 2008-09-05 : 08:07:32
|
| Figured as much. But is it an issue. I assume it is but can't find any confirmation information that it is an issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application files installed on SAN