Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
Author |
Topic |
shobhaaradhya
Starting Member
37 Posts |
Posted - 2012-11-08 : 05:48:00
|
Hi, I am facing a serious issue with subscription. The scenario isAfter restoring and making the changes to db 'Stationarytx'.I am taking an example of a table "PaperPrint"select max(id) from PaperPrintresults 1876100038(Max id for the same table in before restoring is 1473000025.)Now publish the db and create snapshot.After publishing the identity range is setting correctly for this table ie ID > 1876100038 and ID < 1876000000.Start subscribing the db.After sql merge agent is executed successfully when I look into the subscribed database ie "PaperPrint" table the identity range will be ([ID] > 147500000 and [ID] < 147600000) and the identity range for the same table in publisher db is also ([ID] > 147400000 and [ID] < 147500000). So the identity range which is set while publishing is completely gone.If again I republish db and subscribe the ranges would have increased by 1000000 ie (ofcourse this is the range set while publishing) in publisher - [ID] > 147600000 and [ID] < 147700000in subscribed db - [ID] > 147700000 and [ID] < 147800000This is happening for all the tables which has identity key property.I am creating only one subscription.I get the following warning during publishingWarning: only Subscribers running SQL Server 2000 can synchronize with publication 'xxx' because automatic identity ranges are being used.Warning: only Subscribers running SQL Server 2000 can synchronize with publication 'xxx' because column-level collation is scripted out with the article schema creation script.Warning: only Subscribers running SQL Server 2000 can synchronize with publication 'xxx' because extended properties are scripted out with the article schema creation script.Warning: only Subscribers running SQL Server 2000 can synchronize with publication 'xxx' because data types new in SQL Server 2000 exist in one of its articles.Any help would be appreciated. Pls.Thanks, |
|
|
|
|