Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
Brad
Starting Member
13 Posts |
Posted - 2000-12-07 : 14:50:42
|
| I've been having problems with the performance on a bulk insert of 100,900,000 rows. The table has only a 65 byte record length. The input file is about 4.23 gigs. It takes about 10 hours to run. Does anyone have any ideas? I've tried playing with ROWS_PER_BATCH making it 1000000 and it seems to help. Does anyone know the optimal batch size?BULK INSERT People.DBO.Person FROM 'e:\People\People.txt' WITH ( TABLOCK, FORMATFILE = 'e:\sqldata\People.fmt', ORDER (Zip Asc), )The system:Windows 2000SQL Server 20004 PentiumIII 400MHZ Xeons with 1 meg cache2 gigs of RAM.I don't see why it should take anymore than a couple of hours. I can load a table with the same number of records with 7 times the record length in about 10 hours. |
|
|
|
|
|