Please start any new threads on our new site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2000 Forums
 SQL Server Administration (2000)
 Clustering Standard Edition

Author  Topic 

izaltsman
A custom title

1139 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-03 : 18:30:34
Hi, All!

Microsoft provides failover clustering as a feature of the SQL2k Enterprise Edition...

However, there are tools out there (such as SQL-UP! by Incepto) that claim to provide clustering for Standard Edition... I was wondering if anyone here has ever used those tools and could share the experiences (especially with regards to reliability, managebility and cost).



Edited by - izaltsman on 06/03/2003 18:31:14

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-03 : 18:52:28
But if reliability (and availability most importantly) is what your company needs, then why not use SQL2k Enterprise Edition? I understand that cost is probably the reason, but shouldn't reliability outweigh cost issues?

Tara

Edited by - tduggan on 06/03/2003 18:52:51
Go to Top of Page

izaltsman
A custom title

1139 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 09:37:32
Well, I agree with you to some extent, but I'm working for a fairly small company and my budget is pretty tight. Besides, SQL-UP! has some features that aren't available with Enterprise Edition cluster... In any event, at this point I am just exploring my options and I want to see what people think about various clustering solutions.



Edited by - izaltsman on 06/04/2003 09:37:47
Go to Top of Page

srf
Starting Member

42 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 12:45:50
I'm not sure if log shipping is available in Standard edition, but if it is you might look into that for failover. Keeps your failover server up to date within a few minutes of the production server, and a lot simpler than clustering.

Go to Top of Page

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 12:48:08
We actually do log shipping and failover clustering. We have a requirement for being "highly available", so we have a lot of redundancy (hardware, disaster recovery site, etc...).

Tara
Go to Top of Page

Andraax
Aged Yak Warrior

790 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 12:49:51
Log shipping is only available in enterprise edition :(

Go to Top of Page

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 12:54:20
Well yes, so another reason to use Enterprise Edition.

Tara
Go to Top of Page

srf
Starting Member

42 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 12:55:58
Script your own log shipping then. ;)

Go to Top of Page

izaltsman
A custom title

1139 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 13:07:38
quote:

Script your own log shipping then. ;)



Already did... Seems to be working pretty well too...
And I'll probably keep it in place even after I implement a cluster.
Main problem with log shipping though is the fact that I can not completely automate the failover process.

Go to Top of Page

eyechart
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker

3575 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 15:45:48
quote:

Already did... Seems to be working pretty well too...
And I'll probably keep it in place even after I implement a cluster.
Main problem with log shipping though is the fact that I can not completely automate the failover process.



This sounds interesting. Is there anyway you can post some of your code?


-ec

Go to Top of Page

tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess

38200 Posts

Posted - 2003-06-04 : 16:02:28
www.sql-server-performance.com details how to manually setup log shipping without using Ent. Edt.

Here's the article:
[url]http://www.sql-server-performance.com/sql_server_log_shipping.asp[/url]

Edited by - tduggan on 06/04/2003 16:04:16
Go to Top of Page
   

- Advertisement -