Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
mike123
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
1462 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-26 : 19:09:34
|
| I'm running on 2 36gb SCSI drives in a RAID 1 configuration. I see the system slow down from time to time, but can't pinpoint the bottleneck. I've never used performance monitor for tracking physical disk performance, here are my numbers hopefully they paint a decent picture.Thanks ! mike123Counter / Last / Average / Minimum / MaximumPages/sec / 15.982 / 11.030 / 0.000 / 102.979Avg Disk / 6.135 / 1.735 / 0.142 / 9.566Queue Length[CPU]Processor / 53.000 / 29.446 / 2.000 / 85.000Time %Disk Read / 586.875 / 162.643 / 12.722 / 928.553Time %Disk Time / 613.537 / 173.458 / 14.180 / 956.573%Disk Write / 26.662 / 10.815 / 1.458 / 95.433Time %Idle Time / 13.241 / 50.418 / 0.000 / 88.453Avg Disk / 5592.104 / 5628.356 / 3882.198 / 14048.000Bytes ReadAvg Disk / 5652.317 / 5366.044 / 4111.876 / 8157.867Bytes XferAvg Disk / 5746.939 / 5099.945/ 4096.000/ 7697.356Bytes WriteAvg Disk / 6.135 / 1.735 / 0.142 / 9.566Queue LengthAvg Disk Read / 5.869 / 1.626 / 0.127 / 9.286Queue LengthAvg Disk / 0.076 / 0.029 / 0.007 / 0.129sec/ReadAvg Disk / 0.049 / 0.015 / 0.003 / 0.069sec/XferAvg Disk / 0.005 / 0.002 / 0.000 / 0.017sec/WriteAvg Disk Write / 0.267 / 0.108 / 0.015 / 0.954Queue LengthCurrent Disk Write / 2 / 2 / 0 / 23 Queue LengthDisk Bytes / 711371.0 / 604876.0 / 352188.4 / 1093429.0/secDisk Read / 430095.885 / 319496.306 / 125927.4 / 757091.0bytes /secDisk Reads / 76.911 / 56.765/ 15.997 / 113.978/secDisk Transfers / 125.855 / 112.723 / 44.991 / 200.961/secDisk Write / 281275.549 / 285379.810 / 143332.6 / 562073.6Bytes /secDisk Writes / 48.944 / 55.957 / 27.955 / 98.982/sec[MEMORY]Pages/sec / 51.982/ 11.030/ 27.955 / 98.982 Split IO/sec / 10.987 / 7.404 / 27.955 / 98.982 |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-27 : 14:41:02
|
| http://www.sql-server-performance.com/performance_monitor_counters_io.aspTara |
 |
|
|
mike123
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
1462 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-27 : 18:26:51
|
| thanks tara... looks like there wasnt much to analyze ....I am basically debating whether to upgrade my drives from 10k to 15k, or change the RAIDThis helps tho...Thanks |
 |
|
|
derrickleggett
Pointy Haired Yak DBA
4184 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-27 : 20:10:03
|
| If you can squeeze in four more drive, I would go with a RAID 10. The upgrade to 15k drives is big though and should reduce some of your queue lengths. Have you looked at the target server memory, total server memory, buffer cache hit ratio, and cache hit ratio?Also, when you see the slowdowns, what counters are getting worse?I'm assuming you're already looking at Profiler to see if you have anything running badly there???MeanOldDBAderrickleggett@hotmail.comWhen life gives you a lemon, fire the DBA. |
 |
|
|
mike123
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
1462 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-28 : 01:45:27
|
| Hi Derrick,I am currently RAID 1It looks like I will probably be upgrading to RAID 0+1 with 4x36gb 15k SCSI's. What do you think of that? I have 6 drive bays and am going to use 4 for the RAID 0+1 and 1 drive for the IIS log, unless you strongly recommend something else.I will look into your suggestions and see what I find.Thanks alot!mike123 |
 |
|
|
derrickleggett
Pointy Haired Yak DBA
4184 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-28 : 04:54:23
|
| That would be a pretty significant upgrade on disk speed. I would use RAID 10 instead of 0+1. Also, If you have 6 drive bays are you planning on having the OS on one drive and the IIS log on another? If so, I would just use RAID 1 on those and have both on the same drive. I don't like having anything without redundancy.MeanOldDBAderrickleggett@hotmail.comWhen life gives you a lemon, fire the DBA. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|