Please start any new threads on our new site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.

 All Forums
 SQL Server 2000 Forums
 SQL Server Administration (2000)
 Interpreting import monitoring results

Author  Topic 

CanadaDBA

583 Posts

Posted - 2005-05-24 : 11:04:32
On a SQL2000/Win2003 server with 1GB RAM(my test server), I imported data from a text file and ran PerfMon on another server to monitor the process. At the time of import no one was using the database.

I have interpreted the results based on the document "How to Perform aSQL Server Performance Audit" by Brad M. McGehee in www.sql-server-performance.com. But there are some misunderestanding matching my data with the document.

Here are the results of my PerfMon:

1. The "SQL Server Buffer: Buffer Cache Hit Ratio" counter has:
Ave 99.5
Min 86.7
Max 99.89
How we can interpret the Ave. high buffer cache hit ratio? Note that my work was only import.

2. The "Physical Disk: % Disk time" counter has:
Ave 135
Min 0
Max 23430
What does the 135 or 23430 mean? How a disk can be busy more than 100% of the time?

3. The “Memory: Pages/sec” counter has:
Ave 21
Min 0
Max 2023
Is Ave. of 21 acceptable? What are the acceptable limits for this measure? Is there any official documentation for this?
During the import there are two 5 minutes spikes with more than 100 pages/sec. Can I call it bottleneck?

4. The “Processor: % Processor Time” counter has:
Ave 7.45
Min 0
Max 25.55
If earlier counters show a bottleneck, shouldn’t this counter be higher? Shouldn’t the processor spend time idling waiting on IO?


Canada DBA

CanadaDBA

583 Posts

Posted - 2005-05-24 : 11:47:08
I found % Disk Time May Exceed 100 Percent in the Performance Monitor MMC article in http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;310067&sd=tech

Canada DBA
Go to Top of Page
   

- Advertisement -