Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
Author |
Topic |
ottorm
Starting Member
5 Posts |
Posted - 2007-02-06 : 12:08:34
|
HelloI have the following problem:- I have a transactional replication between a publisher and a few suscribers,- The servers are SQL 2003.- I have Identities columns in some of the tables- I'm using the Automatic Identity Range HandlingThe problems happens when the publisher or one of the suscriber goes down, (it happens relativly often and we can't do anything against it), so when the connection is restablished, the merge agent assign a new identity range to the publisher or the suscriber(the one that went down).Everytime a server goes down, it "eats" a idetity range, doesnt matter how many idenities have been used, and i am running out of identity ranges.I want to keep using the Automatic Identity Range Handling to manage the replication activity because changing it to manual would be really hard for us.Im new at this but I see two ways to solution it:1) avoid that the marge agent assign a new identity range when a server goes down2) let the merge agent assign a new identity range, and the reestablish the identity to the heigest id value (using CHECKIDENTITY()), but i think i would have to do some extra things to make the publisher to be sincronized with the suscribers (maybe modify a table on the publisher or something)Could someone please tell me what is the easier way to solution it, if there is another easier way and how to implement it, or the other two?thanks for your attention |
|
SwePeso
Patron Saint of Lost Yaks
30421 Posts |
Posted - 2007-02-06 : 13:13:05
|
What datatype for "IDENTITY" are you using?Peter LarssonHelsingborg, Sweden |
|
|
ottorm
Starting Member
5 Posts |
Posted - 2007-02-06 : 14:54:09
|
quote: Originally posted by Peso What datatype for "IDENTITY" are you using?Peter LarssonHelsingborg, Sweden
i'm using the positive values of an int, it would be 2 billion id's, i will modify the size of the ranges to fit more rangesI was wondering if there is a way to modify the value that the publisher will give to the next server that will need a range? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|